The Pillars of the Earth

Follett's Craft Lost in Translation

Book (1989) vs. The Series (2010) — Sergio Mimica-Gezzan

Quick Answer
Key Difference

The novel teaches you how cathedrals are built; the series only shows you them rising.

Best VersionBook
Read First?Yes
The Book
The Pillars of the Earth book cover Buy the Book →

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

The Series
The Pillars of the Earth trailer

Starring Tom Builder, Eddie Redmayne, Hayley Atwell — Starz: 2010

AuthorKen Follett
Book Published1989
Series Released2010
DirectorSergio Mimica-Gezzan
GenreHistorical Fiction
Book Wins
⚠️ Contains spoilers – We discuss plot details and the ending.

The Story in Brief

In twelfth-century England, during the civil war known as The Anarchy, a master builder named Tom Builder dreams of constructing a cathedral. His path crosses with Prior Philip, a monk of conscience and ambition trying to rebuild the priory of Kingsbridge, and with Ellen and her son Jack, whose own story spans the novel's forty-year timeframe. Against a background of political violence between King Stephen and Empress Maud, religious intrigue involving Bishop Waleran Bigod, and the specific pleasures of medieval architecture, Follett builds an epic that makes the construction of a building feel like the most dramatic act in the world.

Published in 1989 after twelve years of research, the novel became one of the bestselling historical novels ever written and has sold over twenty-five million copies. Mimica-Gezzan's 2010 Starz miniseries, starring an ensemble cast that includes a young Eddie Redmayne as Jack, Hayley Atwell as Aliena, Rufus Sewell as Tom Builder, and Ian McShane as Bishop Waleran, is a faithful, ambitious adaptation that demonstrates both what eight hours can and cannot do with a thousand-page novel.

The series premiered to strong reviews and was nominated for three Golden Globes, including Best Miniseries. It remains one of the most successful literary adaptations of the 2010s, praised particularly for its production design and casting, though critics noted the inevitable compression of Follett's sprawling narrative.

CharacterIn the BookIn the The Series
Tom Builder
Rufus Sewell
A master mason whose obsession with building a cathedral drives the first half of the novel; dies midway through, passing his dream to Jack. Sewell plays Tom with a weathered dignity and quiet intensity, capturing the character's single-minded devotion to his craft and his complicated family dynamics.
Jack Jackson
Eddie Redmayne
Ellen's son, raised in the forest, who becomes a master builder and architect; his love for Aliena and his artistic genius are central to the novel's second half. Redmayne brings fierce intelligence and emotional volatility to Jack, making him immediately compelling even as the series compresses his decades-long development.
Aliena
Hayley Atwell
The Earl of Shiring's daughter, dispossessed and forced to rebuild her life as a wool merchant; her resilience and business acumen make her one of Follett's most memorable heroines. Atwell delivers the series' finest performance, playing Aliena with fierce intelligence and determined resourcefulness, never sentimentalizing her suffering or triumph.
Prior Philip
Matthew Macfadyen
The idealistic monk who becomes prior of Kingsbridge and champions the cathedral's construction despite political and ecclesiastical opposition. Macfadyen captures Philip's moral conviction and political naivety, though the series reduces some of his more complex maneuvering within church politics.
William Hamleigh
David Oakes
The novel's primary villain, a brutal nobleman whose rejected proposal to Aliena sets off decades of violence and revenge. Oakes plays William with maximum menace, leaning into the character's sadism; both versions are designed to be straightforwardly despised.
Bishop Waleran Bigod
Ian McShane
The ambitious, corrupt bishop who opposes Philip and manipulates church politics for personal gain throughout the novel. McShane brings his characteristic charisma to Waleran, making him a more watchable villain than Follett's version, though equally unscrupulous.

Key Differences

The cathedral as protagonist

Follett's most remarkable achievement is making the building of a cathedral genuinely suspenseful — the architectural decisions, the engineering challenges, the specific problems of Gothic construction in an era before modern mathematics are rendered with enough detail to be fascinating and enough narrative propulsion to keep a thousand pages moving. The novel explains why pointed arches distribute weight differently than rounded ones, why flying buttresses allow for larger windows, why the collapse of the original roof requires Jack to redesign the entire structure.

The series shows us the cathedral rising visually, which is its own satisfaction, but the architectural texture — the reasoning behind each decision, the beauty of Follett's technical research made dramatic — is necessarily compressed. You see the building grow; you don't understand its bones the way the novel teaches you to. The book gives you a building that you understand; the series gives you a building that you can see.

The compression of decades

The novel spans approximately forty years, from Tom Builder's initial dream through Jack's completion of the cathedral as a master architect. Follett uses this timeframe to show how political, religious, and personal fortunes shift across a generation — characters age, children grow up, enemies become irrelevant, new villains emerge. Tom dies midway through; Jack grows from a forest-raised boy to England's finest architect; Aliena builds a wool empire over decades.

The series compresses this timeline into what feels like perhaps fifteen years, using aged makeup and subtle costume changes that are variably effective. Redmayne and Atwell play their characters from youth to middle age, which works on screen but loses the novel's sense of watching history grind through individual lives over decades. The longitudinal sweep — the specific quality of seeing the same characters navigate entirely different political landscapes as young people and then as aging survivors — is one of the novel's defining qualities, and eight hours is not enough time to fully replicate it.

Aliena's wool trade and economic detail

In the novel, Aliena's reconstruction of her life after her father's dispossession is told through the specific mechanics of the medieval wool trade — she learns to judge fleece quality, negotiate with Flemish buyers, navigate the complexities of credit and transport. Follett makes medieval commerce as dramatic as medieval warfare, and Aliena's business acumen is as central to her character as her relationship with Jack.

The series preserves Aliena's wool merchant storyline but reduces the economic detail that makes it fascinating in the novel. Atwell's performance conveys Aliena's intelligence and determination, but the series can't afford the page space Follett devotes to explaining how she outmaneuvers her competitors or why the Flemish market matters. You see that she's successful; the novel shows you how.

The villains and their motivations

Follett's villains — particularly William Hamleigh and Bishop Waleran — are among the novel's most discussed elements, criticized by some as cartoonishly evil and defended by others as necessary to the epic's moral architecture. William's brutality is relentless and his motivations are largely psychological — his rejected proposal to Aliena festers into decades of violence. Waleran is ambitious and corrupt but given enough political context to feel like a product of medieval church politics.

The series inherits this quality: David Oakes plays William with maximum menace, and the character's crimes — including the rape of Aliena and the burning of Kingsbridge — are staged with a directness that Starz's cable format allows. Ian McShane's Waleran is more charismatic than Follett's version, which makes him more watchable but perhaps less believably petty. Both versions are designed to be straightforwardly despised, and both succeed.

Ellen's witchcraft and the supernatural

In the novel, Ellen — Jack's mother — is presented as a woman living outside society, knowledgeable about herbs and nature, who curses those who wrong her family. Her curses are ambiguous; Follett leaves it unclear whether they have supernatural power or simply psychological effect. She's a figure of folk wisdom and maternal ferocity, and her presence gives the novel a touch of the uncanny without committing to outright magic.

The series, with Natalia Wörner playing Ellen, leans slightly more into the supernatural, staging her curses with visual effects and ominous music that make them feel more explicitly magical. It's a small shift, but it changes the texture — the novel's Ellen exists in a world where superstition and reality blur; the series' Ellen exists in a world where curses demonstrably work. The difference is subtle but affects the story's relationship to the medieval worldview it depicts.

Yes — the novel's architectural detail, its longitudinal sweep, and its specific texture of a world constructed over twelve years of research are the experience. Follett teaches you how cathedrals are built, how medieval commerce worked, how political power shifted during The Anarchy, and he does it through characters whose lives span decades. The series is a faithful companion that preserves the main narrative and delivers strong performances, but it abbreviates too much of what makes the novel exceptional.

Read first; watch the series to see the cathedral rise and to see Redmayne and Atwell embody Jack and Aliena. The book is the fuller world, the one where you understand not just what happens but how and why. The series is the visual companion, best appreciated after you've lived in Follett's Kingsbridge long enough to know its stones.

Should You Read First?

Yes — the novel's architectural detail, its longitudinal sweep, and its specific texture of a world constructed over twelve years of research are the experience. Follett teaches you how cathedrals are built, how medieval commerce worked, how political power shifted during The Anarchy, and he does it through characters whose lives span decades. The series is a faithful companion that preserves the main narrative and delivers strong performances, but it abbreviates too much of what makes the novel exceptional.

Read first; watch the series to see the cathedral rise and to see Redmayne and Atwell embody Jack and Aliena. The book is the fuller world, the one where you understand not just what happens but how and why. The series is the visual companion, best appreciated after you've lived in Follett's Kingsbridge long enough to know its stones.

Verdict

Follett's novel earns its thousand pages through a commitment to making medieval architecture feel urgent and a timeframe long enough to show what history does to people across generations. The 2010 series is a well-cast, faithful adaptation that demonstrates the limits of eight hours when the source has forty years of story to tell. Redmayne and Atwell are the right Jack and Aliena; the novel is the fuller version of their world. Read first, then watch the cathedral rise.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the series capture the architectural detail from Follett's novel?
The 2010 Starz miniseries is structurally faithful to Ken Follett's novel, preserving the main characters, plot arcs, and the cathedral-building narrative. However, it compresses the book's forty-year timespan and reduces the architectural detail that makes the novel distinctive. Major storylines remain intact, but the series abbreviates subplots and secondary characters to fit eight episodes.
How long does it take to read The Pillars of the Earth?
The novel runs just over 1,000 pages and typically takes 20-30 hours to read, depending on pace. Follett's prose is accessible and propulsive despite the length — the architectural and historical detail is woven into the narrative rather than presented as exposition. Most readers find the pacing faster than the page count suggests.
Who plays Jack in The Pillars of the Earth series?
Eddie Redmayne plays Jack Jackson in the 2010 miniseries, in one of his early major roles before The Theory of Everything and Fantastic Beasts. His performance captures Jack's artistic intensity and emotional volatility, though the series compresses the character's decades-long development in the novel into a more concentrated arc.
Is The Pillars of the Earth part of a series?
Yes, The Pillars of the Earth is the first book in Ken Follett's Kingsbridge series. It's followed by World Without End (set 150 years later in the same town), A Column of Fire (set during the Elizabethan era), and The Evening and the Morning (a prequel set 150 years before Pillars). Each novel is standalone with different characters, connected only by the location of Kingsbridge.
Is the violence in The Pillars of the Earth series as graphic as the book?
The Starz miniseries retains much of the novel's violence, including William Hamleigh's brutal acts and the depictions of medieval warfare and cruelty. The cable format allows for graphic content that matches the book's unflinching portrayal of twelfth-century brutality. Both versions are explicit about the violence of The Anarchy period, though the series stages it visually in ways some viewers find more confronting than Follett's prose.